![]() When all four recommendations are from new reviewers, letters from previous reviewers may be included in addition to the requisite four letters of recommendation. No more than two of the requisite four letters may come from previous reviewers, and shall include an explanation as to why these reviewers were used again for the full Professorship review. Letters of recommendation, for Full Professorships, should not come solely from the individuals who reviewed the candidate for his/her Associate Professor promotion. Members of review committees (HSAC, ASAC, APT) who reviewed a candidate at the departmental level, should also recuse themselves from the discussion and vote at the review committee level. A committee member who has co-authored substantial or ongoing publications or grants with a candidate during the time period under review should recuse himself/herself from the committee to avoid raising concerns about a potential conflict of interest. School/departmental review committees may not include persons related to the candidate by blood or marriage. This is a concern at all levels of decision-making from the school/departmental level, to the review by the APT committee, and on to the Board of Trustees. We seek to avoid possible conflicts of interest in the conduct of university appointments, promotions and tenure decisions. Service and engagement statement, if applicable (CV Policy Change 11-18-2014).Grants (role, total direct grant amount, % effort, agency, dates, etc.).Undergraduate honors projects should be included as well. Give names of graduate students supervised, thesis titles, and completion dates for degree work since employment at UNC-Chapel Hill. List courses for the past three years number of students taught by section. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |